Saturday, October 17, 2015

Redesigned Syllabus

Syracuse University

WRT 105, Practices of Academic Writing

Fall 2015

Instructor: Mrs. Amber Desimony

Course Credits: 3
Room C244
Contact: adesimoy@niskyschools.org

Course Description and Rationale
WRT 105 is an introduction to academic writing.  In this class, you will write, revise, edit and reflect on your writing with the support of the teacher. You will engage critically with the opinions and voices of others as you develop a greater understanding of how your writing can have an effect on yourself and your environment. In addition, you will have regular opportunities to write and to reflect on your development as a writer. The course will engage you in analysis and argument, practices that are interdependent and that carry across academic disciplinary lines and into professional and civic writing.


Analysis, as Rosenwasser and Stephen claim in Writing Analytically 7th edition, “is a form of detective work that typically pursues something puzzling, something you are seeking to understand rather than something you believe you already have the answers to. Analysis finds questions where there seemed not to be any, and it makes connections that might not have been evident at first. Analysis is, then, more than just a set of skills: it is a frame of mind, an attitude toward experience” (2-3). Analysis skills are important because they can be applied to many aspects of life. This class will help you to further develop your analysis skills through literature, writing, and reflection.
Argument involves inquiry and analysis and engages others in ongoing conversations about topics of common concern. In addition to being persuasive, arguments can be a means of sharing information, posing important questions, or even raising consciousness about issues. In this class, evidence for your arguments will come from analysis, from discussion with others, from your personal experience, and from research. You will also learn that arguments are dependent on the situation at hand: that is, they look, sound, and persuade differently depending on audience, purpose, genre and context.[1]   

























   WRT 105 Learning Outcomes and Goals

1.       Writing as Situated Process
Students will practice a range of invention and revision strategies appropriate to various writing situations.

2.      Writing with Sources
Students will be introduced to primary and secondary research, utilize various library resources, evaluate sources, and synthesize and apply research in accordance with citation, genre conventions and ethical standards.
3.      Writing as Rhetorical Action
Students will gain knowledge of rhetorical principles and practice addressing different audiences and situations.
4.      Writing as Academic Practice
Students will build their familiarity with values, strategies, and conventions related to a range of academic contexts and disciplinary conversations.
5.      Writing as Social Practice
Students will analyze, reflect on, and practice the dynamic use of language in diverse contexts and recognize issues of power, difference and materiality.










Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Unit 1 Reflection

Unit 1 Reflection Blog Post
Marlene Lawston

The academic style of writing has a number of components. One component involves the structure of the writing piece; in an academic style essay there must be an introductory paragraph, body paragraphs, and a concluding paragraph. A second component is academic tone, which is formal and succinct. These two components of academic writing have been taught to us [students] starting at a young age.  In WRT 105, my understanding of academic writing style was improved as we were introduced to two new components of academic writing, the ideas of abstract thought and referencing the literature of other authors. Abstract thought is the newest component of academic writing. With this component, the topics that are written about are often nonconcrete and complex, requiring us to form theories and claims instead of simply agreeing or disagreeing with an idea or a piece of literature. This is more challenging because it requires a thorough understanding of the topic at hand and it goes against human instinct, which is to immediately “take a side.”  Referencing literature was also an important component that we previously had brief exposure to. This component, however, was important for this assignment because it was useful as evidence to support our claims and it demonstrated a thorough comprehension of the literature from class.
In addition to academic writing, we blogged. This type of writing was new to me because it has different conventions than academic writing. For example, in academic writing, the authors typically write in the third person to hold a formal tone while in blogging, it is very common for the author to write in the first person and colloquially. Also, blogging does not require the writing structure that academic writing does and authors have more freedom when it comes to structuring their piece.
            In March 2015, I attended the three day National Youth Service-Learning conference in Washington DC with fellow volunteers from Sunnyview Rehabilitation Hospital. A major theme of this conference was “Education Inequity.” All of the students in my group were from fairly affluent areas and went to good high schools such as Niskayuna, Bethlehem and Shaker. When students and teachers from all over the Nation spoke at the conference about the negative impact of students sitting in a classroom and being lectured to all day, we did not really understand what they were talking about because we had always viewed education as liberating, not oppressive and discouraging to the student. This is why The Banking System of Education and Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work stood out to me as we progressed through the unit. They both included numerous impactful quotations that were important in shaping my claim such as in Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work, when the teacher of “working class” students said “Simple punctuation is all they'll ever use.”  These two pieces of literature completely changed the way I view the education system. Before, I did not realize the complexity of the issue; I thought it was simple, as long as an individual could stay in school and receive an education, they had a high chance of being successful in life. I thought that the main obstacles they would encounter would be outside of school and that education could only benefit them. When I read about how the banking system of education can in fact be oppressive and how the type of education children receive is based directly on the circumstances of their birth, I realized that my point of view on the education system was skewed.  This is when I had the idea to incorporate into my claim that the “American Dream” is not attainable for some because education opportunities are very unequal across the United States, and even when there is access to education, it can be discouraging to the student and turn them away from the path to the American Dream.